Assignment Content

Reflect on the comments provided by your fellow students through the critical analysis (A2) of your planned polycentric governance system identified in A1. 

Submit a written document in word or pdf format reflecting on the guidance provided through A2 on the implementation of your planned polycentric governance system (A1) using the following as a guide: 

• Briefly describe the proposal presented in A1 and the process of initial analysis and ‘consultation’ undertaken (i.e. A2). 
• Outline the key points from the guidance provided by your fellow students in A2. 
• Provide your reflections on the original plan (A1) based on the guidance provided through A2 and your own reflections through further knowledge and understandings. This should be in the form of a response to the suggestions provided from A2 from your fellow students. You can agree with the suggestions or provide alternatives. You should use credible sources of information (references) to substantiate your position on these. 
• Describe how you would address each of the items raised in A2 through a revised plan for implementing the polycentric governance system. Use credible sources of information (references) to support your revised plan. 
• Summarise the key changes or adaptations made to your original plan based on the reflections undertaken. Outline the next steps in the process of implementing the planned polycentric governance system. 

 

Review the grading rubric provided for further information on the key criteria for this assessment. 

 

LEADERSHIP, MANAGEMENT STYLES AND ORGANISATIONAL NEEDS

Introduction

 The management styles in the leadership model have been critically analyzed as the fundamental needs and requirements that can give some putative advantages for the organizational needs and requirements of the organizations. This management style has been recognized by the common leadership advantages visionary autocrats in the process. The linear economy system and its assessments can drive some positive assessment that initiates towards the best fundamentals for the task. This resource has been affected by the raw materials and its compressed usefulness which can affect the systematic materials in the process.

This can be described as some beneficial advantages that affect the alternative procedures of the task. This can affect the extracted raw materials and further developments in the task that intentionally restores the fundamental benefits in the leadership strategy and management style to develop the polycentric governance system. The actual polycentric government system has generated some beneficial advantages that affect the ecological and individual advantages for making sustainable governance programs in the process. This can affect the market variations that initially increase the plans and available alternatives in the market for increasing the resilience management and leadership programs' polycentric governance system for an organization. 

The proposal presented

The achieving collecting actions that can be effective in order to understand the variability’s in the Resilience management and leadership skills that may increase the important aspects of the polycentric governance for an organization. that has been affecting the collective approaches and its sustentative systems for understanding the presented proposals in the task. As per the view of Bohensky et al. (2015), this has affected the polycentric approaches for creating opportunities to implicate Resilience management and leadership skills in the support system. In the previous journals, this has been critically discussed with several implications of the leaders and the sustentative ecological systems. This can create better opportunities that can affect some alternative options in the social context of the studies.

In previous studies, it has been discussed about the important contributions of sustainable strategies to increase the potential benefits of fostering resilience systems. strategic goals that may plan better opportunities and its substantive variability’s for maintaining the learning conditions of the management and its residences in the studies. As per the view of Geschwind et al. (2022), this has affected the important variability’s of the social learning aspects that create modules for the beneficial advantages of the studies. This can increase the important aspects that leaders had been affecting the helpful variability’s in order to secure variable ventures for the organizational advantages in customer feedback. 

Process of initial analysis and consultation undertaken

In this study, the operational planning procedures in business studies can affect the important practices in the polycentric government system. This has changed the key components of the polycentric government system, which summarizes the provided suggestions that increase the further knowledge that implements the process of undertaken elections on the boards. As per the view of Biggs et al. (2015), according to previous studies, the polycentric government system has been an increased governance system that guides the students to identify the adaptations for the polycentric governance systems. As per the view of Bennis et al. (2015), this has been discussed about the variable importance of the subordinate changes for the implementation steps towards their ventures of the studies, in previous studies, the changes and its adaptations have been started to accelerate the methods of the planned systems for the ventures in the polycentric government system. This sustainability process of the business has been affecting the reduced size of the current systems that can increase the current assessments of the foster collaborations in the polycentric government system.  

In the last studies, the self-organized compositions have auto-nominee independence that can affect the competition in the accountability of the task. the p[process of initial analysis and its assessments that can increase the consulted resolutions for the students. As per the view of Schoon et al. (2015), the polycentric government system can be a corporation process in order to diversify the important ventures that assist the conflicted variations for the beneficial advantages of the tasks. This can be increased by the polycentric approaches and their assessments that may have developed corporate collaborations. polycentric government system. has been defining some effective hierarchy policies that may define some adaptive approaches as an example. 

The management styles of the polycentric government system in the leadership model have been critically analyzed the fundamental needs and its requirements that can give some putative advantages for the organizational needs and requirements of the organizations. As per the view of Leitch et al. (2015),  the fundamental benefits of the process that increase the effective variations of the products can be used in the important practices in the polycentric government system. This management style has been recognized by the common leadership advantages visionary autocrats in the process. that affects some conceptualized operators in the effective business ventures in the current system. The linear economy system and its assessments can drive some positive assessment that initiates towards best fundamentals for the important practices in the polycentric government system.

Key points

In the previous studies, the important variables in the task have been reflected with the actual polycentric government system that has generated some beneficial advantages that affect the ecological and individual advantages for making sustainable governance programs in the process. In the previous studies, the Resilience management and leadership skills have been critically analyzed by the students for the studies. This can affect the market variations that initially increase the plans and available alternatives in the market for increasing the resilience management and leadership programs' polycentric governance system in an organization. As per the view of Cundill et al. (2015),   this polycentric government system guides the ventures towards the complex governance system and its applications that can affect the polycentric variations in the decision-making systems of the task. 

The polycentric resource has been affected by the raw materials and its compressed usefulness which can affect the systematic materials in the process. This can be described as some beneficial advantages that affect the alternative procedures for the polycentric government system. This can affect the extracted raw materials and further developments in the task that intentionally restores the fundamental benefits in the leadership strategy and management style to develop the polycentric governance system. This has been centered on the decision-making progenitors of the consumers and the customers for analyzing the polycentric government system. 

The polycentric government system has been critically discussed and analyzed by the polycentric hierarchies in the planning. The operators in the business can diversify all the advantages for the task that can diversify the complex governmental system towards the important aspects of the ethnocentric approaches of the studies. This has mainly diversified the important parts for the political systems of the studies. a polycentric government system has been affecting the collective approaches and its sustinative systems for understanding the presented proposals in the task.

As per the view of Geschwind et al. (2022), the polycentric government system has been discussed; it has been discussed about the important contributions of sustainable strategies in order to increase the potential benefits of fostering resilience systems. The transitional advantages of the task can be the efforts of the individual concept and its assessments that help to manage the polycentric government system for the strategic goals. the current learning experiences, which may plan better opportunities and its substantive variability’s for maintaining the learning conditions of the management and its residences in the studies.

Reflections on the original plan

In this analysis, I have learned that for a decision-making system to work under better availability of multiple, overlapping principles and suggested particular methods. From my perspective under polycentric autonomy defining a better element of challenges under stakeholder assurance would have to define the situation under choosing act paradigm. Polycentrism under normal terms would have to connote multiple centers under a semi autonomous decision-making factor through initiating enhanced governance systems through natural resource system implantation. The fundamental ventures in the business have been affecting the market conceptualizations that can make effective changes in the business prominence of the ecological systems. The resilience management and leadership model have critically analyzed the fundamental needs and its requirements that can give some putative advantages for the organizational needs and requirements of the organizations.

As per the view of Cundill et al. (2015), the fundamental benefits of the process that increase the effective variations of the products can be used in the important practices in the Resilience management and leadership model. This management style has been recognized by the common leadership advantages visionary autocrats in the process. that affects some conceptualized operators in the effective business ventures in the current system of Resilience management and leadership model.

I through the developed assessment have tried to shed light over the implementation of the retail industry system. As per the view of Bohensky et al. (2015), this creates added advantages under which the centralized form of governance is better instituted under ecological and social-cultural balance. Reflecting under the principle of resilience perpetuating repeated expenditure policy would develop better balance integration under issuing of demand for customers. I feel initiating an understanding of interdisciplinary context would develop a common concern under the systematic development of polycentric factors. I feel producing greater clarity might as well ensure a common understanding of natural resource governance.  This has been based on the guidance provided through A2 and your own reflections through further knowledge and understanding.

This kind of Polycentrism should be in the form of a response in order to the suggestions provided by A2 from your fellow students. As per the view of Geschwind et al. (2022), the linear economy system and its assessments can drive some positive assessment that initiates towards best fundamentals for the important practices in Resilience management and leadership. 

Revised plan for implementing the polycentric governance system

The polycentric government system has affected the polycentric approaches for creating opportunities to implicate Resilience management and leadership skills in the support system for understanding the workplace diversities in order to help the current activities and its assessments that affects the feedback policy of the customers and the consumers. The polycentric government system can provide a cognitive and complex CDU system that helps in order to improvise the fundamental benefits of the studies.

As per the view of Geschwind et al. (2022), this can increase the resilience and the variables that affect it in order to help the principles of the existing leadership in the module. The current variability’s in the business studies have been affecting the market capabilities that critically increase the acceptability of the polycentric government system. This can increase the important aspects of the polycentric government system, which can analyze the leaders that may affect the helpful variability’s in order to secure variable ventures for the organizational advantages in the customer feedback. This needs to manage the connectivity issues of the polycentric governance that increases the opportunity to help the ventures with sustentative models. 

In the previous studies, the polycentric government system has outlined the important aspects and its sustainable feedback of the customers in order to compose the socio-ecological models for the task. The polycentric government system has changed the key components of the polycentric government system, which summarizes the provided suggestions for the adaptive management system. As per the view of Bohensky et al. (2015), the polycentric government system can increase the further knowledge that implements the process of undertaking elections on the boards. According to previous studies, the polycentric government system has been an increased governance system that guides the students in order to identify the adaptations for polycentric governance in any organization.

This has been discussed about the variable importance of the subordinate changes for the implementation steps towards their ventures of the studies that connect the slow variables for approaching system feedback in the substantive task. That current resilience in the task has critically affected the experiences of the polycentric government system, which can initially help the ventures for providing feedback compositions in the task. As per the view of Cundill et al. (2015),  the polycentric government system has increased the sustainability process of the business and has been affecting the reduced size of the current systems which can increase the current assessments of the fostered collaborations in the polycentric government system.  

Key changes or adaptations of the original plan

After analysing organizational management and leadership processes this can be stated this organisation adopts "Resilience Management & Leadership" business planning. This type of planning help to maintain threats, significant stress and adversity so the organisation can maintain management styles by defining organisation needs. For developing this type of original planning, need to change some essential factors. This planning needs to prepare essential components that help to maintain organizational basic and necessary needs. These types of key changes help to improve organizational strategy development that clearly identifies all requirements of this organisation and its stakeholders.

This planning process needs to craft a vision so that this organisation develops their planning by following all types of management and planning process. This organisation also needs to take some adaptive changes that may involve iterative and gradual changes that undertake various processes and strategies of management (Geschwind et al. 2022). In this way, this organisation can improve demand for this organisation by maintaining all these types of adaptive changes. This planning also adapts some transformational changes that involve developing of scale and scope of organisation management procedures.    

Moreover, this organisation also chose a "polycentric governance system" that helps to maintain the autonomous maintenance of this organisation. It also needs some changes that involve the maintenance of strategic goals, managing the key performance of indicators, and defining the strategic scope of every project so the employees and members can understand business planning. This particular planning also needs to change maintaining stakeholders and other team members. In this way, this planning can develop an organizational management process. These types of occasional and sudden changes in organizational adapted or original business planning help this organisation to improve its business strategy (Bohensky et al. 2015). it also helps to improve organizational management planning that helps to gather information about business vocations that improve the leadership process of the organisation. These types of key changes help to guide various types of organizational changes that help to maintain relationships between employees and leaders to improve productivity.  it also helps to reproduce effective management strategies that help to maintain effective behaviour in the workplace.           

Next steps to implement the planned polycentric governance system

Polycentricism is a complex system which is being followed in the governance for coordinating different aspects of autonomy in the country. Different decisions are being taken by the government in this approach and different arguments are also considered in this aspect so from different jurisdictions. There are varieties of decisions which are taken into consideration based on jurisdictions and different complexity arises in the decisions which are made. Based on this polycentric governance different management strategies are being hired so that different conflicts can be solved based on the complexity of the task (Biggs et al. 2015). This type of governance also considers different "interdisciplinary contexts" based on which different administrative tasks can be conducted and different scholarships can also be provided in an efficient manner. It also allows to development of different ideas based on the topic on which the government is working so that the complexity of the environment can be reduced in an efficient manner. 

In order to implement a planned polycentric governance system it is essential to maintain specific policies that are being introduced by the government. Polcycentricity refers to a government system that ensures different governing bodies' interaction in order to prepare and enforce regulations. Developing greater clarity during policy implementation plays a significant role as well as helping to achieve desired outcomes. It has been identified that natural resource governance can be used during the implementation of polycentric governance systems. Human activities are required to be enacted by bringing technological advancements (Bennis et al. 2015). Technology plays an important role in the implementation of polycentric governance systems. Subsequently, potential leverages in the context of community-based systems practices need to be considered. Despite following this wide range of implementation processes, it is important to focus on public administration and manage the systematic development in regard to polycnetricitiy. Decision-making centres are required to be considered so that polycentric governance systems can be implemented properly.

This system also allowed us to understand different theoretical models which can be used for the betterment of the task and different information can be gathered in an efficient manner. It also allows to prediction of the involvement of different complex systems so that different risk which are associated with the task can easily be mitigated in an efficient manner (Schoon et al. 2015). This style of governance is also used for detecting the scope and advantages of the task based on which different factors can be determined in an efficient manner. It also takes into account the disadvantages which can be mitigated for better results. 

Conclusion

It has been concluded that several implications of the polycentric government system have gathered some effective knowledge from the previous studies. The provided advantages have been encouraging the learning procedures from the residences CDU and its current assessments on the project portfolio. A2.  It has been concluded that initial assessments in the business studies have been reflecting some fundamental benefits and its assessments that can help to increase the module overview towards the studies. It has been concluded that several implications of the polycentric government system has been an increased governance system that guides the students to identify the adaptations for the polycentric governance. This study has concluded that In the last studies, the self-organized compositions have auto-nominee independence that can affect the competition in the accountability of the task.

This study has concluded those collective approaches and its sustentative systems for understanding the presented proposals for maintaining some individual approaches for the further developments of the studies in the task. The current assessments that help in order to evaluate certain variability’s in order to measure the collective advantages of the studies. This study has been concluded that several can align the linear economy system and its assessments can drive some positive assessment that initiates towards best fundamentals for the important practices in the polycentric government system.

References

Journals:

Bohensky, E., Evans, L., Anderies, J., Biggs, D. and Fabricius, C. (2015). Principle 4: Foster Complex Adaptive Systems Thinking. Chapter 6. In Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems​. Biggs, R., Schlüter, M. and Schoon, M.L. (eds). Cambridge University Press.  ​https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316014240.005 

Geschwind, L., Pinheiro, R., Stensaker, B. (2022). Organizational Persistence in Highly Institutionalized Environments: Unpacking the Relation Between Identity and Resilience. In: Pinheiro, R., Frigotto, M.L., Young, M. (eds) Towards Resilient Organizations and Societies. Public Sector Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82072-5_8

Biggs, R., Gordon, L., Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Schlüter, M. and Walker, B. (2015). Principle 3: Manage Slow Variables and Feedback. Chapter 5. In Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems.​ Biggs, R., Schlüter, M. and Schoon, M.L. (eds). Cambridge University Press.

Bennis, Sample, S. B., & Asghar, R. (2015). The Art and Adventure of Leadership: Understanding Failure, Resilience and Success (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. pp. 38-43

Schoon, M., Robards, M., Meek, C. and Galaz, V. (2015). Principle 7: Promote Polycentric Governance Systems. Chapter 9. In Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems​. Biggs, R., Schlüter, M. and Schoon, M.L. (eds). Cambridge University Press.  ​https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316014240.005 

Leitch, A., Cundill, G., Schultz, L. and Meek, C. (2015). Principle 6: Broaden Participation. Chapter 8. In Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems​. Biggs, R., Schlüter, M. and Schoon, M.L. (eds). Cambridge University Press.  ​https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316014240.005